2120 active members
  174 are online

Year

19

Day

264

Time

01:17:53

Guest
Login
snewsgnewsmessagegeneralfactioninventorycombatroom
Year 11 Day 264 0:10
Icarus Carinae

Question:
I hope its already in the works, but with the Home One having a DC and multiples being possible, it should be renamed to a more appropriate name?

possibly;

Mon Calamari MC-80 Home One Class Cruiser


Edited By: Icarus Carinae on Year 11 Day 264 0:12
Year 11 Day 264 2:38
Agreed, if the SSD is getting a re-name to reflect that the Executor was also it's ship class the Home One needs to be identified in the same way


Year 11 Day 264 3:14
It would be "MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser". At least try to get the canon name. >.


Year 11 Day 264 7:54
Like it's done :)


____________

Sim Master Veynom

*** This post is written on 100% recyclable electrons. ***
Year 11 Day 264 11:43
Veynom, seriously. Please remove "Mon Calamari" from the name. That's NOT the canon name and it's redundant with "MC80" there.

It'd be like calling it the Human Victory-class Star Destroyer.


____________

ZE_Cronus_sig3.png
ZE-believer.jpg
Year 11 Day 264 13:33
Zero Turner

I agree with Weylin, I think "MC-80 Home One Class Cruiser" looks better.

though in The New Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels they are called Mon Calamari MC80 Star Cruisers... so I assume the Mon Calamari portion may actually be more canon.

HomeOne.jpg


____________

Zero-sig.jpg

Join Date: Year 3 Day 340

Year 11 Day 264 14:20
And I've seen those books put Kuat Drive Yards ___insert ship class___. It doesn't mean it's part of the actual class name.

I notice that the book page there only actually says it once... Hell, it's not even entirely about the MC80 series!


Year 11 Day 264 15:18
Gunther Innis Tennor

Mon Cal + MC = Redundant


____________

Robotic Japanese Toilet: I give you...happy poopy time.
Fry: Sorry, you know too much.