No, the 'B-Wing' is the B-Wing. The C-Wing Ugly is...the C-Wing Ugly. Which aesthetically looks to be a combination of YT and B-Wing parts. Just like the TIE-Wing is a mix of Y-Wing and TIE Fighter and the X-ceptor thing is a X-Wing and TIE Fighter.
wookiepedia says that it was pretty much a b-wing body with a yt series cockpit bolted on instead of the normal b-wing one (except that the weapons are different)
The C-Wing and the B-Wing are practically the same in stats, this ship however has the image of a B-Wing not even the 'ugly' version which had a YT-part attached,
which is the B-Wing Ugly by the way.
The C-Wing was a fictional ship created by 'Cory' as part of a demonstration on what ships can be made with " Wizards of the Coast d20 roleplaying book, Starships of the Galaxy. "
This is either a B-Wing ugly which the picture and stats indicate, or its a C-Wing which is a fictional ship and has no place being introduced as uncanon (if usual conduct is upheld).
Also it has 2 passengers to many for either design.
Yes, the C-Wing was created as a demo. The C-Wing Ugly, a DIFFERENT SHIP, has appeared in Cracken's Threat Dossier, Scum and Villainy, Ambush at Corellia, and Showdown at Centerpoint.
C-Wing Ugly:
B-Wing:
Really? Those look identical to you? You don't see the massive YT-1300 cockpit in the top screen? Do you need glasses?
The only thing "better" for the C-Wing is that it's faster and slightly longer. The B-Wing has heavier armor, shields, ionic capcity, and more weapons.
And if you're so opposed to non-canon ships, btw, I'll take any YT-510s you, or whatever faction you're affiliated with, have. Same with Tabders. :D
also, it isn't actually the B-wing ugly, it is the Correlian/B-wing ugly, which the combine shortened to C-wing ugly, not C-wing (which is a non-canon ship while the Correlian/B-wing ugly is canon)
Fine, my only meaning is that this should be called a "B-Wing Ugly", calling it a C-Wing ugly completely negates the possibility of a R&D C-Wing doesn't it, since we've already tagged the name for a completey different already named ship with as admitted a B-Wing pic. Surely a name change isn't hard to ask for, its a single database entry. But yes i'll give up if it means that much to people..
Chris,
you should give it up because you are just plain wrong. B-Wings and C-Wing UGLIES are different ships, as has been pointed out to you in clear pictures and other means.
“The Corellian/B-wing Ugly, also known as the C-Wing Ugly
- wookieepedia ”
Now, given there is an issue with wookieepedia not being a primary source, what do the primary sources for the ship refer to it as?
You're also contradicting your earlier statement about the C-wing being non-canon and therefore something we shouldn't introduce. This invalidates your complaints that using the name prevents us from adding the other ship, since that ship doesn't exist.
____________
"May the Grace of Ara go with you, and His Vengeance be wrought upon your enemies."
The ship does not exist, that doesn't mean that after R&D runs out of canon ships, far far in the future... a C-Wing couldn't be developed. (to resemble the one mentioned as a RPG book example).
I will admit if canon evidence of this is proved I will back off, though if its canon name is also a B-Wing Ugly so why not name it as such?
ok, i have the series of books that the ship is featured in, and sometime soon i'll be able to confirm if it is called a C-wing Ugly in the books, is that good enough for you?