I have a question for the administration.....at what point did repeated attempts to obtain information from a factions website/forum become an acceptable course of action?
Siarica Aylina banned for exploting a weakness in PHP
44 days later the ban on this persons character is removed (without even a notice via Sim News?) and they are free to continue as they wish without a care in the world, likely with a promise that they won't do it again. This ban was for her "second" attempt to create a list of Black Sun members by "hacking" the factions forum, during the first attempt she used scripts and then attempted to sell the information until she was given a "warning" by the administration that if she sold the information (or used any form of automated scripts/etc to acquire such information again) that she would be permanently banned.
For a few months Siarca seemed to behave herself and show that she valued the second chance she had been given, a very rare chance given that most are usually banned immediately for such actions.....then she starts telling people that she has found a way to generate a list of members on Black sun's forum by changing a single character, and that without the use of anything automated she is getting hundreds of random attempts a minute. Siarca is so proud of herself for figuring out how to get the information she was after the first time around with this method (in doing so she believed that she had found a "loophole" in the warning from the first attempt) that she is outright gloating to people on IRC as she generates the list....and during all this she makes the following remark.
The player behind Siarca has been repeatedly killed by members of Black Sun because they obsessively keep trying to join the faction, it is only natural that they have some measure of animosity against those running the organization or possibly even the group itself. If this group was merely a test run, would we have heard about it at all if she had tried it on a smaller faction? What would happen if a member of some faction/government went through this same process on another group....would they have been unbanned a little over a month after trying to create a list of targets?
This method of hacking is a deliberate attempt to do something, without express permission given from a system administrator to perform it there is no "good intentions" that can be justified by it. Siarca's actions violated not one, but TWO sections of the rules that everyone in this game is expected to follow....
This person has broken these rules on AT LEAST two occasions, they have been given a second chance in the past and they forfeited it on Day 273. What justification is there in removing the ban on a person that has proven to be (and have deliberate intentions of) a threat to the welfare of this community by repeatedly violating the rules everyone else follows?
Siarica Aylina banned for exploting a weakness in PHP
44 days later the ban on this persons character is removed (without even a notice via Sim News?) and they are free to continue as they wish without a care in the world, likely with a promise that they won't do it again. This ban was for her "second" attempt to create a list of Black Sun members by "hacking" the factions forum, during the first attempt she used scripts and then attempted to sell the information until she was given a "warning" by the administration that if she sold the information (or used any form of automated scripts/etc to acquire such information again) that she would be permanently banned.
For a few months Siarca seemed to behave herself and show that she valued the second chance she had been given, a very rare chance given that most are usually banned immediately for such actions.....then she starts telling people that she has found a way to generate a list of members on Black sun's forum by changing a single character, and that without the use of anything automated she is getting hundreds of random attempts a minute. Siarca is so proud of herself for figuring out how to get the information she was after the first time around with this method (in doing so she believed that she had found a "loophole" in the warning from the first attempt) that she is outright gloating to people on IRC as she generates the list....and during all this she makes the following remark.
“[18:31] Siarica> Hey, you really need to calm down. the Black Sun forums were just a test.
- IRC excerpt
”
The player behind Siarca has been repeatedly killed by members of Black Sun because they obsessively keep trying to join the faction, it is only natural that they have some measure of animosity against those running the organization or possibly even the group itself. If this group was merely a test run, would we have heard about it at all if she had tried it on a smaller faction? What would happen if a member of some faction/government went through this same process on another group....would they have been unbanned a little over a month after trying to create a list of targets?
This method of hacking is a deliberate attempt to do something, without express permission given from a system administrator to perform it there is no "good intentions" that can be justified by it. Siarca's actions violated not one, but TWO sections of the rules that everyone in this game is expected to follow....
“Hack or exploit software weaknesses in web pages, chat rooms, or any other areas of a group or faction.
Obtain files from any storage medium of another player or faction through the use of hacking, worms, trojans or other software infiltration methods.
- The Rules, - You "CAN NOT"
”
This person has broken these rules on AT LEAST two occasions, they have been given a second chance in the past and they forfeited it on Day 273. What justification is there in removing the ban on a person that has proven to be (and have deliberate intentions of) a threat to the welfare of this community by repeatedly violating the rules everyone else follows?
Edited By: Olivia Ava Vatz on Year 12 Day 317 21:00
____________
In self-defense and in defense of the innocent, cowardice is the only sin
